Arudha Padas Calculator — Arudha Lagna & Upapada Lagna
A free Arudha Pada calculator: compute your chart and it instantly derives all twelve Bhava Arudhas — no signup, no paid report.
Arudha Padas are a classical Jaimini technique for how each house actually shows up in the world, as opposed to what it structurally is. For every house, this counts to its lord's own house, then counts that same distance again forward from the lord — with one named exception if the result would land back on the house itself or its opposite. A1, the Arudha of your Ascendant, is the well-known Arudha Lagna — how you're actually perceived, not just who you structurally are. A12 is the Upapada Lagna, Jaimini's primary marriage significator.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an Arudha Pada?
The classical Jaimini technique for how a house actually shows up in the world. For each house, count from it to its lord's own house, then count that same distance again forward from the lord — that sign is the Arudha. One named exception prevents it from landing back on the house itself.
What is the Arudha Lagna (A1)?
The Arudha of your 1st house (Ascendant) — traditionally read as how you actually appear and are perceived by others, as distinct from the Lagna itself, which describes who you structurally are.
What is the Upapada Lagna (A12)?
The Arudha of your 12th house — traditionally the primary Jaimini significator used for marriage and committed partnership.
Why does the Arudha sometimes get pushed forward ten signs?
If the raw calculation would land the Arudha back on the house itself (its 1st) or its 7th, that's treated as an invalid self-reference under the classical rule, and the result is moved forward ten signs instead — the one named exception in an otherwise single, undisputed counting method.
Are Arudha Padas calculated the same way in every tradition?
Yes for the core counting rule — this is standard Jaimini technique agreed across BPHS and every Jaimini source checked, unlike Shadbala-style strength scoring where sources genuinely disagree on sub-weightings.